Aus dem aktuellen PTR Newsletter:
No Money 6-Max, Everyone's Solid
Two weeks ago, we showed you some data about how 6-max has a smaller percentage of winning players than heads up / full ring.
We suggested that 6-max games were the softest, but several newsletter readers called us out and said "No way!". The data could be interpreted two ways:
6-max games have room for more winners, therefore, they're easier.
6-max is so tough that only a small percentage of people are able to beat it
I gotta admit, they made a good point. So, to shed more light on the situation, we broke down the winrate of $50NL, $100NL and $200NL players that played over 1,000 hands in 2010.
Hier noch der Link zum PTR Thread:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.pokertableratings.com/forum/general-ptr/6-max-is-the-softest-t890.html">http://www.pokertableratings.com/forum/ ... -t890.html</a><!-- m -->
PA hat im, wie ich finde sehr beeindruckenden, Interview
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.pokertube.com/ChannelFilms.aspx?movie=13857">http://www.pokertube.com/ChannelFilms.aspx?movie=13857</a><!-- m -->
sehr energisch auf die Frage reagiert, ob die tieferen Stakes zu schlagen sind. "If I move down even a few stakes, I see players that are so bad!" - lol, it's good to be PA (offtopic: habe nicht gewusst, dass er solche gesundheitlichen Probleme hat).
Meiner Erfahrung in den letzten Monaten nach (obwohl ich nur ein paar Tausend hände gespielt habe) hat sich die Schere zwischen den grossen, etablierten Sites zu den kleineren, meist Euro Sites, noch extremer aufgetan.
Was denkt ihr?